Double Taxation Agreement Tanzania And South Africa

There is therefore no evidence that the existence of PDOs is an important determining factor influencing the decisions of multinationals to invest in Tanzania, given that most countries of origin do not have a PDO with Tanzania. However, this does not mean that bilateral agreements are not at all relevant to attracting foreign direct investment. However, if States Parties are at different economic levels, revenues may be significantly affected (from developing to developed countries). That is why Tanzania should be firm in the negotiations on DTAS. Last but not least, Tanzania can also negotiate DTAs to support a specific industry (e.g.B agriculture) in line with the country`s vision of industrialization. (The goal is to use the counterpart`s specific capacities and resources, although Tanzania will temporarily waive most of its tax rights.) Bilateral agreements have often been seen as a magnet for investors and as key factors in promoting foreign direct investment, international trade and the promotion of diplomatic missions and relations. 3.0 Evaluation of the impact of bilateral agreements The tax department of Breakthrough Attorneys has prepared this article to provide an overview of the effectiveness of the bilateral agreements in which Tanzania participates. The terms “bilateral treaties”, “double taxation treaties” and “double taxation treaties” are used synonymously in this article. However, some studies have shown that expectations regarding bilateral agreements are not achievable with regard to FDI.

A 2014 by Baker P.L. A study on “the analysis of double taxation treaties and their impact on foreign direct investment” suggests that the perceived and practical effects of bilateral agreements on the collection of foreign direct investment are exaggerated. Tanzania has signed DTAs with nine countries. It is aimed at Sweden, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway, India, Italy, Zambia and South Africa. With the exception of South Africa, whose treaty was signed in 2005, most of the agreements are old and were signed in the 1960s, 1970s and 1990s. Most of the existing agreements are very old and do not reflect changes in the Tanzanian economy or advances in e-commerce around the world. .

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.